Well, Garbo in Grand Hotel -- if votes on imdb are any indication, only Ninotchka has been seen by more people than Grand Hotel. And she was billed as the lead actress, certainly. Actually, the way the Oscars work, all five of the leads would have been pushed in the lead category.
But I arbitrarily decided that as an ensemble piece, they're all really supporting performances -- thus Joan Crawford in the supporting category, for example, who would otherwise win for best actress.
I'm a big fan of Garbo and I could have nominated her in the supporting category along with Crawford, but personally I think her first great talkie performance was Queen Christina -- still a bit too many silent era gestures in Grand Hotel to hang my hat on in the end.
As for Constance Bennett in What Price Hollywood?, she would have been a good nominee. It was maybe the best performance of her career.
Maybe I should have nominated five actresses. I was reluctant to expand the field from three to four (as all the other years had been) and I had Norma Shearer, Mae Clarke and Marlene Dietrich as my top three and went with Barbara Stanwyck for a representative pre-Code performance.
In fact, all four picks are sort of representative performances -- Shearer for her best performance while the Queen of MGM, Clarke who was in four must-see movies in 1931 and Dietrich who was, well, Dietrich.
But maybe Bennett would have been a better choice. Not sure.
If you are so blinded by all of these talking, weeping, flitting actresses that you would forget the definitive controversy -- and one stemming from your stupid, stupid Katie award to that no-talent numbskull hack Chaney, then
you oughta get your pecker checked to see if you still have one.
Leave these damned actresses behind and get back to what matters -- swordplay.
Oh, right, Silent Star Smackdown. Yes, that was the definitive Katie Award controversy, Douglas Fairbanks and Lon Chaney in a brutal fifteen round slugfest.
I hate to vote against Stanwycke for anything, but THE MIRACLE WOMAN was not her best work, was it? But she did work with lions, and that should count for something.
Named for Katie-Bar-The-Door, the Katies are "alternate Oscars"—who should have been nominated, who should have won—but really they're just an excuse to write a history of the movies from the Silent Era to the present day.
To see a list of nominees and winners by decade, as well as links to my essays about them, click the highlighted links:
Remember: There are no wrong answers, only movies you haven't seen yet.
The Silent Oscars
And don't forget to check out the Silent Oscars—my year-by-year choices for best picture, director and all four acting categories for the pre-Oscar years, 1902-1927.
Look at me—Joe College, with a touch of arthritis. Are my eyes really brown? Uh, no, they're green. Would we have the nerve to dive into the icy water and save a person from drowning? That's a key question. I, of course, can't swim, so I never have to face it. Say, haven't you anything better to do than to keep popping in here early every morning and asking a lot of fool questions?
6 comments:
What about Garbo for Grand Hotel or Constance Bennett for What Price Hollywood?
Well, Garbo in Grand Hotel -- if votes on imdb are any indication, only Ninotchka has been seen by more people than Grand Hotel. And she was billed as the lead actress, certainly. Actually, the way the Oscars work, all five of the leads would have been pushed in the lead category.
But I arbitrarily decided that as an ensemble piece, they're all really supporting performances -- thus Joan Crawford in the supporting category, for example, who would otherwise win for best actress.
I'm a big fan of Garbo and I could have nominated her in the supporting category along with Crawford, but personally I think her first great talkie performance was Queen Christina -- still a bit too many silent era gestures in Grand Hotel to hang my hat on in the end.
As for Constance Bennett in What Price Hollywood?, she would have been a good nominee. It was maybe the best performance of her career.
Maybe I should have nominated five actresses. I was reluctant to expand the field from three to four (as all the other years had been) and I had Norma Shearer, Mae Clarke and Marlene Dietrich as my top three and went with Barbara Stanwyck for a representative pre-Code performance.
In fact, all four picks are sort of representative performances -- Shearer for her best performance while the Queen of MGM, Clarke who was in four must-see movies in 1931 and Dietrich who was, well, Dietrich.
But maybe Bennett would have been a better choice. Not sure.
The first Katie award controversy!
Bullshit, fruitcake.
If you are so blinded by all of these talking, weeping, flitting actresses that you would forget the
definitive controversy -- and one stemming from your stupid, stupid Katie award to that no-talent numbskull hack Chaney, then
you oughta get your pecker checked to see if you still have one.
Leave these damned actresses behind and get back to what matters -- swordplay.
I'll be back, you four-eyed, hat-wearing, google-eyed sonuvabitch!
Oh, right, Silent Star Smackdown. Yes, that was the definitive Katie Award controversy, Douglas Fairbanks and Lon Chaney in a brutal fifteen round slugfest.
Ah, good times ...
I hate to vote against Stanwycke for anything, but THE MIRACLE WOMAN was not her best work, was it? But she did work with lions, and that should count for something.
I'd say Stanwyck is still at least ten years from her best work -- The Lady Eve and Ball of Fire in 1941 and Double Indemnity in 1944.
A nomination for The Miracle Woman is more like a nod to history ...
Post a Comment