Thought you would include Casablanca here since it was released in November of 1942 though it didn't get an Oscar eligible L.A. release until February of 1943.
But where, where, where, where is Sullivan's Travels, my number one film of the year? How is it not here?
I'm nothing if not inconsistent. I suspect Casablanca will sweep all the categories its nominated in (picture, actor, actress, supporting actor, maybe director). 1943 is a weak year without it, a strong year like 1942 gets wiped out with it. So 1943 I put it in 1943, the year it was Oscar eligible.
Whereas Sullivan's Travels is in 1941 because as with most of the movies, that's the year imdb.com lists it.
Think of these polls as Oscar theater rather than any sort of systematic examination of Oscar history ...
Eventually I'm going to set up separate pages like I did for the 1920s alternate Oscars -- what I may do is have the American films in their year of Oscar eligibility but the foreign films in their year of release.
I'll think about it. You're right, it would be great to have Sullivan's Travels set up in 1942 ...
I sort of arrived at my list of nominees by blending together several lists -- yours, one from a site called Top Movies (https://topmovies.wordpress.com/), a guy named Robert Horton's annual top ten lists (https://roberthorton.wordpress.com/2009/12/27/1942-ten-best-movies/), my own Kate-Bar-The-Door Awards, imdb's top vote getters and imdb's top rated films for a given year. Movies that make all the lists are in, and then it gets a bit trickier from there. It's a way of sort through my own biases.
The imdb isn't going to be much use for films from the last 25 years or so, by the way. For films from, say, the 1950s, there's a strong correlation between number of votes and quality of the movies -- people are seeking out movies based on reputation. But for more recent movies, the number of votes is based mostly on studio marketing campaigns. So the latest unwatable Transformers will have ten times as many votes as an Oscar-worthy film.
Named for Katie-Bar-The-Door, the Katies are "alternate Oscars"—who should have been nominated, who should have won—but really they're just an excuse to write a history of the movies from the Silent Era to the present day.
To see a list of nominees and winners by decade, as well as links to my essays about them, click the highlighted links:
Remember: There are no wrong answers, only movies you haven't seen yet.
The Silent Oscars
And don't forget to check out the Silent Oscars—my year-by-year choices for best picture, director and all four acting categories for the pre-Oscar years, 1902-1927.
Look at me—Joe College, with a touch of arthritis. Are my eyes really brown? Uh, no, they're green. Would we have the nerve to dive into the icy water and save a person from drowning? That's a key question. I, of course, can't swim, so I never have to face it. Say, haven't you anything better to do than to keep popping in here early every morning and asking a lot of fool questions?
4 comments:
Thought you would include Casablanca here since it was released in November of 1942 though it didn't get an Oscar eligible L.A. release until February of 1943.
But where, where, where, where is Sullivan's Travels, my number one film of the year? How is it not here?
I'm nothing if not inconsistent. I suspect Casablanca will sweep all the categories its nominated in (picture, actor, actress, supporting actor, maybe director). 1943 is a weak year without it, a strong year like 1942 gets wiped out with it. So 1943 I put it in 1943, the year it was Oscar eligible.
Whereas Sullivan's Travels is in 1941 because as with most of the movies, that's the year imdb.com lists it.
Think of these polls as Oscar theater rather than any sort of systematic examination of Oscar history ...
Eventually I'm going to set up separate pages like I did for the 1920s alternate Oscars -- what I may do is have the American films in their year of Oscar eligibility but the foreign films in their year of release.
I'll think about it. You're right, it would be great to have Sullivan's Travels set up in 1942 ...
I sort of arrived at my list of nominees by blending together several lists -- yours, one from a site called Top Movies (https://topmovies.wordpress.com/), a guy named Robert Horton's annual top ten lists (https://roberthorton.wordpress.com/2009/12/27/1942-ten-best-movies/), my own Kate-Bar-The-Door Awards, imdb's top vote getters and imdb's top rated films for a given year. Movies that make all the lists are in, and then it gets a bit trickier from there. It's a way of sort through my own biases.
The imdb isn't going to be much use for films from the last 25 years or so, by the way. For films from, say, the 1950s, there's a strong correlation between number of votes and quality of the movies -- people are seeking out movies based on reputation. But for more recent movies, the number of votes is based mostly on studio marketing campaigns. So the latest unwatable Transformers will have ten times as many votes as an Oscar-worthy film.
But I'll cross that bridge if I ever reach it ...
Post a Comment