The Birth of The Feature Film
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ae38/8ae38af82cb88405063c6ec78349b6b5e770661d" alt=""
After the release of Edwin Porter's classic short film The Great Train Robbery in 1903, the motion picture industry evolved rapidly, but until D.W. Griffith developed a film "language" that made complex storytelling possible (read about that effort here), the change was primarily a matter of quantity, not quality.
In the United States, thousands of nickelodeons—theaters where patrons paid a nickle to watch the latest movie—sprang up nationwide, and with them came a need for something to show in them. Maybe that explains why so many of the early studio moguls—Carl Laemmle, Adolph Zukor, Louis B. Mayer, the Warner Brothers—got their start in the industry not as filmmakers but as theater owners.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0709e/0709e3e41a5bdf50fedf52542771763aef7b4d2f" alt=""
But the result was a flood of derivative and undistinguished hackwork, and when Porter (and his boss, Thomas Edison) flinched from the high-risk-high-reward proposition of The Great Train Robbery and retreated back into the safe, bland product they had produced before, American theaters saw little else. By 1914 directors such as Cecil B. DeMille, Charlie Chaplin and Mack Sennett would arrive on the scene and along with Griffith catapult American studios to a commercial dominance they have yet to relinguish. But until that time, it was the ambition and artistry of foreign studios that largely defined cinema.
While the best and most successful of the foreign filmmakers during this era were the "entertainers"—Georges Méliès, Max Linder—a handful of filmmakers aspired to tell more complex stories. But intentions aren't the same as results, and while you'll find plenty of adaptations of Shakespeare, Lewis Carroll, theater productions and the Bible, these films amounted to little more than densely-worded intertitle cards accompanied by a handful of moving pictures.
Directors needed both a technique to tell stories in a purely visual way, and more elbow room than a single reel (eight-to-twelve minutes) of film could afford. Griffith would eventually solve the first problem. The feature-length film would solve the other.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb34d/fb34d1d0d13e45091a273b9f018547d09cc467df" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/701ff/701ff1d5b7263951186d0ce299cfb2e8105b3f61" alt=""
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences now defines a "feature" as a film over forty minutes in duration. By those terms, most film historians cite Australia's The Story Of The Kelly Gang as the first feature-length film. Released in 1906, The Kelly Gang clocked in at a then-astounding 70 minutes. Written and directed by Charles Tait, the film tells the story of Ned Kelly, an Irish-Australian bushranger who battled British authority and was eventually hanged for his trouble. The film was thought lost until one reel turned up in a Melbourne garbage dump; in 2006, additional footage was discovered in the UK, bringing the restored total to 17 minutes. What's left plays like an extended-length version of The Great Train Robbery—no knock, I assure you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45592/4559250e7252f1e5e4b5e7c37ab5adc3b98cd4ce" alt=""
Europe Takes The Lead
It was the Italians, though, who proved most willing to experiment with the long-form film. Italian filmmakers had come late to the party, with the country not producing its first fiction film until 1905. To distinguish their product from the French films that dominated the early marketplace, they focused on subjects with a distinctly Italian flavor, such as the country's recent unification, well-known historical events such as the last days of Pompeii, and notorious figures from Rome's glory days such as Nero and Messalina.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9af4e/9af4e79852db4074331d91abd07bfff602367920" alt=""
"[F]ilm historians have overemphasised early silent cinema's technical innovations over its imagistic brilliance," the author of Film: Ab Initio wrote recently. "For there are four or five scenes in this film which are as breathtaking as any I have encountered in cinema." (If you haven't checked out Film: Ab Initio, you really should—it's an audacious project, proposing to watch every major film from the beginning of time in chronological order—and I can tell you from my own personal experience that when you watch movies that way, you see things you would have otherwise missed.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dba9/6dba96a46ed5230a9b8f1d0b8df35d73164e558c" alt=""
Throughout the era, directors explored new methods for telling stories on film—Lois Weber's use of split-screen, tracking and extreme close-ups in Suspense, Harold Shaw and Dorothy Shore's successful in-camera effects in The Land Beyond the Sunset, and of course D.W. Griffith's own experiments in The Musketeers of Pig Alley—and as they did, their output began to resemble what we now think of motion pictures. These innovations reached a critical mass in 1913 and seemingly overnight, directors the world over adopted these new camera and editing techniques as the industry-wide standard.
"[T]hat year," film historian David Bordwell has written, "seemed to be when filmmakers in several countries simultaneously seized upon what they had already learned of technique and pushed their knowledge to higher levels of expressivity."
Once directors had solved the matter of how to tell stories, longer, more complex movies began turning up everywhere—Russia, France, Germany, the United States. In fact, as many feature-length films hit theaters in 1913 alone as had been produced in the entire decade that proceeded it—more than fifty in all.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f7ec/3f7ecbbab8bdf75ffa6a9dd522e10d73fc0c6efe" alt=""
Although neither film is the director's best—Sjöström would go on to direct The Outlaw and His Wife, The Phantom Carriage and The Wind, while Bauer would direct The Dying Swan before his untimely death in 1917—both made effective use of visual storytelling for the first time in their careers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17e5a/17e5a0d5ca6062c917a1a497897f8229d36767b8" alt=""
We'll talk more about him when I reach 1915.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d4a1/1d4a138c303cd7bb085434246e875eb15203fc7c" alt=""
The most influential film of 1913, however, was one that didn't even make into the theaters until the following year. Giovanni Pastrone's epic Cabiria was a landmark achievement in style and spectacle, and the first truly great long-form film. The culimination of the long-form movement in Italy, Cabiria took two years to film and boasted mammoth sets and elaborate special effects. Its epic scope influenced Griffith's Intolerance and anticipated the pomp of De Mille's later Bible and history spectacles.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42e7c/42e7cfd580bc1872abd312a050f016bc377e44a9" alt=""
Set during the Second Punic War between Rome and Carthage—a subject of great interest to Italian audiences on the eve of World War I—Cabiria is an epic on a grand scale, tracing the life of young woman from childhood to early adulthood against the backdrop of Rome's struggle to establish an empire of its own. The movie opens with the spectacular eruption of Sicily's Mt. Etna, and boasts a tracking shot of refugees trekking across the face of the erupting volcano that rivals any image previously filmed.
"For Cabiria," wrote Cole Smithey, the self-styled "smartest film critic in the world, "Pastrone pioneered the use of deep-focus filming and the since-ubiquitous 'tracking-shot'—two years before D.W. Griffith's Birth of a Nation would employ similar techniques."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0d1/6b0d1e5b126a3c8edcc39ad7592daf6f2db2a1d2" alt=""
Even though the finished film wouldn't premiere in theaters until April 1914, word of Pastrone's project leaked out of Italy and directors worldwide scrambled to make their own long-form films.
The Americans At Last
According to Turner Classic Movies' series Moguls and Movie Stars, the first American producer to see the value in feature-length films was Adolph Zukor, the self-same Adolph Zukor who started life with $40 and limitless ambition. He believed that movie-makers shouldn't limit themselves to ten-minute shorts and the working class audiences that patronized them, but should instead aim for the same quality, prestige—and paying customers—as the theater productions running on New York's Broadway.
To that end, in 1912 Zukor obtained the distribution rights to Les Amours de la Reine Élisabeth, a 45-minute film about the life of Britain's Queen Elizabeth I. Starring Sarah Bernhardt, the film's success in America allowed Zukor to found his own studio, Famous Players, and commit the company to producing six feature-length pictures a year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60aa8/60aa8392ac5239d20d2dd1c5aa75f7d7d0d57a50" alt=""
"[A]bout twenty minutes into Traffic in Souls, [cinematographer Henry Alder] Leach does something extraordinary," writes Daniel Eagan in America's Film Legacy. "He anticipates action, panning the camera from William Powers standing on the shore to Flora Nason and Vera Hansey, two in a crowd of passengers on a ferry pulling into a dock. It was a planned, choreographed shot, one hat predicted the future of cinematography."
Traffic in Souls is preserved in the National Film Archive. (It was the first film to inspire a "novelization," the practice of turning a film into a book.)
That same year, vaudeville performer Jesse Lasky teamed up with struggling Broadway playwright Cecil B. DeMille to found the Jesse L. Lasky Feature Film Company. Reluctantly bankrolled by Lasky's brother-in-law, Samuel Goldwyn, Lasky and DeMille set out to make a feature-length film version of the stageplay The Squaw Man—an audacious undertaking consider that none of them had ever made a movie before.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/096a4/096a41ca4c3124025c8efd49a53dd850e128adf1" alt=""
Legend has it that DeMille and Lasky set up shop in a barn, but legend neglects to mention that the barn already housed a complete movie studio before they got there.
Nevertheless, The Squaw Man was the first feature filmed in Hollywood. It's reception at the box office encouraged both Lasky and DeMille, with the former eventually merging with Zukor's Famous Players to found Paramount Pictures, while the latter went on to become one of the most successful producer-directors in Hollywood history.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01a63/01a630931b8a89b2f749117172f62c391b9eae99" alt=""
Already the most influential director in the world, Griffith's development of classical continuity editing would become the industry standard by 1917 and is the single most common editing style in use by film and television directors today.
The film proved to be pivotal for Griffith, not, however, because it was a financial success. Judith was expensive and Biograph balked at financing additional feature films.
Biograph, wrote Lillian Gish later, "thought that a movie that long would hurt [the audience's] eyes."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efda5/efda510119b6a6155588321551044d453fec341e" alt=""
With two feature films under his belt, Griffith was ready to tackle the biggest project of his career, The Birth of a Nation, the most lucrative and most controversial film of the entire silent era.
Finally, I'll mention Mack Sennett and the first feature-length comedy in movie history, Tillie's Punctured Romance. I've previously written at some length about Tillie here, but I would like to point out that the film's enormous box office appeal further underscored the commercial viability of the long form.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdb64/bdb644115a0cfccd52ab8968ca7378a52076f188" alt=""
6 comments:
No mention of Frederick Warde's Richard III - widely considered the first feature length Shakespeare film, even though it is only 55 minutes. But it is actually fairly easy to get hold of and quite good - made in 1912.
And don't forget Sjostrom's very good Ingeborg Holm from 1913.
But of course your essay had a lot in it, so no complaints.
I actually wrote a couple of lines about Ingeborg Holm -- good early film by Sjostrom.
Richard III I admit I hadn't seen. But I now have access to a copy so I've been working through it this evening. I may add a paragraph about it as an addendum later in the week.
Tomorrow is my post about The Birth of a Nation. Lots of toes to step on, so I'll be polishing that to make sure I tread deftly if not lightly.
I can understand - I think that's why I wrote so little when I wrote about it.
http://nighthawknews.wordpress.com/2009/03/19/great-director-92-dw-griffith/
Wow! great article and impeccable photo choices! That top one makes me think there's a giant inter-dimensional space octopus manifesting itself in an old western bar. The rest are awesome too! Hurray for the monkey!
Thanks, Erich -- the pictures take almost as long as the post sometimes. I wanted to post more pictures with the Birth of a Nation essay as well, but I had committed myself to posting it on April 12 to coincide with the anniversary of Ft. Sumter and by the time 8 p.m. rolled around, it was go with the truncated version of not post at all.
Now that Kino-Lorber have provided me fine DVDs of Feuillade's fine Fant. & Vamp, I am revisiting monkeydom'
s
earlier entries.
You should think about writing. . . .
Post a Comment